Case Note
Case Name: A. Ranjithkumar v. E. Kavitha
Court: Supreme Court of India
Citation: 2025 INSC 978
Bench: Vikram Nath, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J.
Date of Judgment: 14 August 2025
Facts
- The appellant-husband (A. Ranjithkumar) and respondent-wife (E. Kavitha) married on 15.02.2009.
- They relocated to the USA, where the husband was employed.
- A son was born on 07.04.2010.
- The husband filed for divorce in 2012 under Sections 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging cruelty and adultery.
- The Family Court (17.10.2016) granted divorce on the ground of cruelty (adultery was not proved).
- The wife appealed. The Madras High Court (24.08.2018) allowed her appeal, setting aside the decree of divorce.
- Meanwhile, the husband remarried on 05.03.2017.
- Aggrieved, he approached the Supreme Court.
Issues
- Whether the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court was justified.
- Whether the marriage had irretrievably broken down, warranting dissolution under Article 142 of the Constitution.
- What relief, if any, should be granted to the respondent-wife and the child.
Judgment
- The Supreme Court noted that the parties had lived separately since 2010 (15 years), with no scope for reconciliation.
- Since the husband had already remarried, the continuation of the marital tie served no purpose.
- The Court observed that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.
- Exercising powers under Article 142, the Court dissolved the marriage.
- The husband was directed to pay ₹1,25,00,000/- as permanent alimony to the wife and child, payable in five equal quarterly instalments between September 2025 and September 2026.
- Condition: If the husband defaults in payment of any instalment, the order would stand recalled, and any amount already paid would be forfeited.
Decision
- Appeal allowed.
- High Court judgment set aside.
- Marriage dissolved under Article 142.
- Permanent alimony awarded (₹1.25 crore).
Key Legal Principles
- Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage: Though not a statutory ground under the Hindu Marriage Act, the Supreme Court can dissolve marriages under Article 142 to do “complete justice.”
- Cruelty by Third Parties: The High Court had correctly observed that rude utterances by the wife’s father could not automatically be attributed as cruelty by the wife.
- Equitable Relief: The Court balanced equities by dissolving the marriage and securing financial stability for the wife and child.
PDF copy of the judgement is available.